Shakira tax evasion case: Spain charges pop singer for second time, demands over $7 million.

[ 27/09/2023 01:32 ] Read on news9live.com

Report Overview: The article has a score of 80 out of 100, indicating that it is relatively objective. However, there are still some manipulations present in the article that affect its objectivity.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Spanish prosecutors (90)

Shakira (70)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Spanish prosecutors

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Misleading headlines

The headline of the article may be considered misleading as it focuses on the tax evasion charges against Shakira, while not mentioning the ongoing trial and the allegations against Spanish tax authorities.

The headline of the article states 'Shakira tax evasion case: Spain charges pop singer for second time, demands over $7 million.' This headline may lead readers to believe that Shakira is solely responsible for the tax evasion charges, without mentioning the ongoing trial and the allegations against Spanish tax authorities.

Change the headline to 'Shakira faces tax evasion charges in Spain: ongoing trial and allegations against Spanish tax authorities' to provide a more balanced and accurate representation of the situation.

Omission of key information

The article omits key information about the ongoing trial and the allegations against Spanish tax authorities, which could provide a more balanced perspective.

The article mentions that Shakira is already due to be tried in Barcelona on Nov. 20 in a separate case, but it does not provide any details about the allegations against Spanish tax authorities or the ongoing trial.

Include information about the allegations against Spanish tax authorities and the ongoing trial in Barcelona to provide a more comprehensive and balanced perspective.

Biased language

The article uses biased language when referring to the allegations against Shakira, which can influence the reader's perception.

The article states that Shakira is 'alleged' to have used an offshore company to avoid paying taxes, implying that the allegations may not be true. It also mentions that Shakira 'failed' to pay taxes, which carries a negative connotation.

Use neutral language when referring to the allegations against Shakira, such as 'Shakira is accused of using an offshore company to potentially avoid paying taxes' and 'Shakira is said to have not paid taxes'.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.