Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
None
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
Presenting information in a way that is intended to provoke strong emotions or interest
The article uses sensational language to describe fans' disappointment with ticket prices, such as 'fighting to see their favorite music artist in concert without going broke' and 'suffering the consequences of high demand for tickets.'
Use neutral language to describe the situation without exaggeration or emotional language.
Using headlines that do not accurately reflect the content of the article
The headline suggests that a fan was able to access the Amex Ticketmaster presale but couldn't afford any tickets, but the article explains that the fan chose not to buy tickets due to the high prices.
Use a headline that accurately reflects the content of the article, such as 'Fan Gets Access to Amex Ticketmaster Presale but Chooses Not to Buy Tickets Due to High Prices.'
Leaving out important details that could provide a more complete understanding of the topic
The article mentions that fans needed to preregister for access to the ticket sale, but it doesn't provide any information about how many fans were able to access the sale or how many tickets were available.
Include information about the number of fans who were able to access the sale and the availability of tickets to provide a more complete picture of the situation.
Using language that favors one side or presents a subjective viewpoint
The article includes comments from fans expressing disappointment with ticket prices, but it doesn't provide any counterarguments or perspectives from those who may have been able to afford the tickets.
Include a range of perspectives on the ticket prices, including those who were able to afford them, to provide a more balanced view of the situation.
Presenting information in a way that favors one side over another
The article focuses primarily on fans' negative experiences with ticket prices and doesn't provide much information about the ticket sale process or Ticketmaster's perspective.
Include more information about the ticket sale process and Ticketmaster's perspective to provide a more balanced view of the situation.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.