Oprah quietly DELETES controversial Cindy Crawford interview from her YouTube - after supermodel called her out for 'treating her like chattel' by telling her to flaunt her body on-air to prove she was 'worthy' of fame.

[ 20/09/2023 16:19 ] Read on dailymail.co.uk

Report Overview: The article contains some manipulations such as sensationalism, misleading headlines, omission of key information, biased language, and appeal to emotion. These manipulations contribute to a lower objectivity score.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Oprah Winfrey (40)

Cindy Crawford (60)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Cindy Crawford

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Sensationalism

The article uses sensational language to grab attention and create a dramatic effect.

Oprah quietly DELETES controversial Cindy Crawford interview from her YouTube - after supermodel called her out for 'treating her like chattel' by telling her to flaunt her body on-air to prove she was 'worthy' of fame

Use a more neutral and objective headline that accurately represents the content of the article.

Misleading headlines

The headline of the article is designed to mislead or exaggerate the content.

Use a more accurate and objective headline that reflects the content of the article.

Omission of key information

The article fails to provide important details or context that could affect the reader's understanding of the situation.

Just hours after Cindy's comments were published by DailyMail.com, the video was quietly switched to private on the Oprah Winfrey Network YouTube page - despite having been available to watch for the past three years.

Include information about why the video was switched to private and any response or statement from Oprah Winfrey or her spokesperson.

Biased language

The article uses language that shows a clear bias towards one side of the story.

Cindy, 57, recalled: ' I was like the chattel or a child, to be seen and not heard'

Use neutral language that presents the information without bias.

Appeal to emotion

The article uses emotional language or anecdotes to manipulate the reader's feelings.

Reflecting on how she felt in that moment, Cindy admitted: 'I was like the chattel or a child, to be seen and not heard. 'When you look at it through today's eyes, Oprah's like, 'Stand up and show me your body. Show us why you're worthy of being here'.

Present the information without relying on emotional language or anecdotes.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.