Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Vivek Ramaswamy
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The article uses sensational language to create excitement or provoke strong emotions.
The article describes Jake Paul's vlog as showcasing a 'long-shot Republican presidential primary candidate' and refers to Ramaswamy as a 'far-right figure.' These descriptions are sensational and may be used to create a negative perception of Ramaswamy.
Use neutral language to describe the individuals involved.
The article uses language that shows a preference or bias towards a particular side or viewpoint.
The article refers to Ramaswamy as a 'far-right figure' and describes Paul's support for him as 'promoting' him. This biased language suggests a negative connotation towards Ramaswamy and his political views.
Use neutral language to describe the individuals and their actions.
The article selectively presents data or information that supports a particular viewpoint while ignoring contradictory data or information.
The article mentions Ramaswamy's appearance in Paul's vlog but fails to provide any context or information about Ramaswamy's political positions or campaign. This cherry-picking of data limits the reader's understanding of Ramaswamy and his association with Paul.
Provide more information about Ramaswamy's political positions and campaign to provide a balanced view.
The article leaves out important information that is necessary for a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
The article mentions Paul's support for Ramaswamy but does not provide any information about Ramaswamy's response or perspective on the endorsement. This omission of key information limits the reader's understanding of the situation.
Include Ramaswamy's response or perspective on Paul's endorsement to provide a more complete picture.
The article presents information in a way that favors one side or viewpoint over others.
The article focuses primarily on Paul's support for Ramaswamy and includes negative information about other individuals associated with Paul. This unbalanced reporting creates a skewed perception of the situation.
Include information about other candidates or individuals involved in the presidential primary race to provide a more balanced view.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.