Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
- Objectivity Score
Media Manipulation and Bias Detection
Auto-Improving with AI and User Feedback
HonestyMeter - AI powered bias detection
CLICK ANY SECTION TO GIVE FEEDBACK, IMPROVE THE REPORT, SHAPE A FAIRER WORLD!
Megyn Kelly
Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.
Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.
The article uses sensationalism to create interest and drama.
The article emphasizes the past conflict between Megyn Kelly and Donald Trump, using phrases like 'erupted over her debate question' and 'bad feelings linger.' This sensationalized language adds drama to the story.
Use neutral language to describe the past conflict between Megyn Kelly and Donald Trump.
The headline of the article is misleading and does not accurately represent the content.
The headline suggests that Megyn Kelly welcomed Donald Trump for an interview 8 years after their infamous debate question. However, the article itself mentions that the interview took place recently, not 8 years later.
Use a more accurate headline that reflects the actual timeline of the interview.
The article uses biased language to favor one side over the other.
The article includes phrases like 'infuriated the future president' and 'a villain to many conservatives' which show a bias against Donald Trump.
Use neutral language that does not show favoritism towards either Megyn Kelly or Donald Trump.
The article omits key information that could provide a more balanced perspective.
The article does not mention any positive aspects of Donald Trump's presidency or any criticisms of Megyn Kelly's career as a journalist-commentator. This omission of key information contributes to the unbalanced reporting.
Include relevant information that provides a more balanced perspective on both Megyn Kelly and Donald Trump.
The article provides a one-sided view of the interview and does not present both sides of the story.
The article focuses primarily on Megyn Kelly's perspective and does not provide enough information about Donald Trump's responses or viewpoints.
Include more information about Donald Trump's responses and viewpoints to provide a more balanced view of the interview.
- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.