Facebook hosts vile Andrew Tate content despite its own pledge to ban influencer.

[ 02/09/2023 17:21 ] Read on mirror.co.uk

Report Overview: The article has a score of 60 out of 100, indicating that it contains a moderate amount of manipulations. While it provides some information about Andrew Tate and his banned content on Facebook, it also includes biased language, sensationalism, and omission of key information. The article could be more objective by presenting a balanced view and providing more context about the actions taken by Facebook.

Sides Objectivity Scores

Facebook (40)

Andrew Tate (80)

Sides Representation Balance

Favored Side

Andrew Tate

Caution! Due to inherent human biases, it may seem that reports on articles aligning with our views are crafted by opponents. Conversely, reports about articles that contradict our beliefs might seem to be authored by allies. However, such perceptions are likely to be incorrect. These impressions can be caused by the fact that in both scenarios, articles are subjected to critical evaluation. This report is the product of an AI model that is significantly less biased than human analyses and has been explicitly instructed to strictly maintain 100% neutrality.

Nevertheless, HonestyMeter is in the experimental stage and is continuously improving through user feedback. If the report seems inaccurate, we encourage you to submit feedback , helping us enhance the accuracy and reliability of HonestyMeter and contributing to media transparency.

Detected Manipulations & Suggested Changes

Biased language

The article uses biased language to describe Andrew Tate and his content, which can influence the reader's perception.

Facebook has enabled misogynist influencer Andrew Tate to gain nine million followers despite a pledge to ban him. The 36-year-old was removed from social media platforms last year for sharing harmful content – including saying rape victims should “bear responsibility” for being attacked.

Use neutral language to describe Andrew Tate and his content.

Provide more context and evidence to support the claims made about Andrew Tate's content.

Omission of key information

The article omits key information about the actions taken by Facebook and the reasons behind them, which can lead to a biased representation of the situation.

Yet despite its own ban, Facebook hosted a “verified page” in his name for over a month – only removing it after being alerted by this newspaper. By then, it had built up a following of almost nine million likes.

Provide more information about why Facebook initially allowed Andrew Tate's verified page to exist despite the ban.

Include Facebook's response to the situation and any actions taken to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Sensationalism

The article uses sensational language and focuses on the negative aspects of the situation, which can create a biased narrative.

One alleged Tate victim accused the site and other platforms of putting profit before safety. She said: “Like the other women, I know what Tate says online isn’t a joke. I know because he put his ideologies into practice when he abused me and many others. I don’t think the potential harm should his influence remain can be overstated.”

Present a balanced view by including perspectives from both sides of the issue.

Avoid using sensational language and focus on providing factual information.

Spread the Truth

Share Report!

- This is an EXPERIMENTAL DEMO version that is not intended to be used for any other purpose than to showcase the technology's potential. We are in the process of developing more sophisticated algorithms to significantly enhance the reliability and consistency of evaluations. Nevertheless, even in its current state, HonestyMeter frequently offers valuable insights that are challenging for humans to detect.